I can’t help but think though that all arguments are built aroud human based analogy. There is a huge assumption here that a deity if it exists must be amenable to the realms of human thought and philosophy. Surely the very definition of a deity would imply that this is potentially not true. I agree that one can do away with the irrational and worrying thought patterns that occur among many religious groups and sects. However one cannot necessarily discount a deity based on human based thinking and analogy alone.