Rss    Facebook

Pre-stunning of animals at slaughter in the UK: Government inaction

Monday 10th August 2009 12:37 in Politics, Religion | 1,218 views logged | 1 comment

I have researched and written a 6,000 word report which should be landing on the desks of the following people today:

  • Sadiq Khan MP – Member for Tooting ← Took six months to reply
  • Hilary Benn MP – Secretary of State for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs
  • Nigel Farage MEP – Leader, United Kingdom Independence Party
  • Nick Herbert MP – Shadow Secretary of State for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs
  • Professor Christopher Wathes – Chairman, Farm Animal Welfare Council

Lamb at slaughterIts subject is blatant government appeasement on animal cruelty in order to satisfy religious groups in the UK, since 1985. I have requested that my local MP, Sadiq Khan, raise the issue in parliament on my behalf at the soonest opportunity.

In short: the government has failed to ban slaughter without pre-stunning in the UK, despite being repeatedly advised to do so by its own appointed experts, the FAWC. Instead it allows two laws in the land: one for Jews and Muslims and another for the rest of us.

The report is carefully researched, comprehensive – and damning. It is copyrighted to me – if you’d like to print or distribute it please contact me first:

Pre-stunning of animals at slaughter in the UK: Government inaction (PDF, 118.46 KB) — Downloaded 411 times

Cover letter to Sadiq Khan MP (PDF, 20.72 KB) — Downloaded 90 times

You might like to pressure your MP on this issue too. You don’t have the right to complain if you don’t do anything about it. Let’s begin fighting back against the constant tide of government appeasement. Let’s make them act.

Update: I have received responses to my report.

1 Comment »

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

  1. Just to note here:

    • Sadiq Khan (Labour) took six months to send an appeasing “non-reply” on this issue – hardly surprising. Please don’t vote for him in Tooting.
    • Nick Herbert (Tories) didn’t reply at all. An assistant did, but nothing of substance was ever forthcoming.
    • UKIP replied admirably, unequivocally condemning the inconsistency in the law.

    Given his recent performance on the televised debate, I wish I had sent the report to Nick Clegg of the Liberal Democrats too. I might have had a reply from them. But being liberal they would presumably allow religious people to do as they please.


    Comment by Gavin — Saturday 17th April 2010 #

Leave a comment


Note: This comment form is intended for use only by intelligent, courteous people who can write properly. Illiterate comments will be deleted. Threatening or abusive comments will be forwarded to your Internet Service Provider along with your I.P. address (in this case 38.107.191.83).

XHTML: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>





Powered by WordPress. RSS Entries and comments feeds. Valid XHTML and CSS. Copyright © 2010 Gavin Orland.  ^Top^