Rss    Facebook

An example of biased journalism

Wednesday 3rd March 2010 22:00 in Politics | 158 views logged | No comments

Radio Netherlands website has run an article on the popularity of Geert Wilders in that country, heavily biased against him, of course. I have “marked” the article here, supplying corrections which will expose the politically correct bias which is sadly evident across all of Europe’s mainstream publications:

“And the winner is… Geert Wilders’ Freedom Party. As elections are held for the country’s municipal councils in the Netherlands, it is already clear who will come out ahead. We need not wait for the ballots to be counted.

Right-wing populist Rising star Geert Wilders, pictured above casting his vote in The Hague this morning, has managed to dominate the agenda appealed to voters once again. Everyone’s talking about immigration, integration and Islam – the Freedom Party’s main issues. Evidence? Or they are talking about the Freedom Party (PVV) itself, and whether it should be ruled out of potential coalition talks due to allegedly racist standpoints. ? You tell us.

30,000 votes
The Freedom Party’s hold (Like a stranglehold? Nobody is forcing people!) on the Dutch national attention is the more remarkable given that it is taking part in only two of the 394 municipalities holding elections on Wednesday. About four percent of the Dutch population will be able to cast a vote for the Freedom Party. Good..

The municipal councils in these two cities, The Hague and Almere, right now are divided between 12 and 10 parties, respectively. The Freedom Party could become the biggest party in Almere with just 30 percent of the vote. Plus, turnout for local elections is always low. Good – reporting facts, avoiding blatant bias..

Add up all these factors, and about 30,000 votes for Mr Wilders’ party will make him the hands down winner on Wednesday. Can you be sure? What leads you to this conclusion?

All politics are national
Wednesday’s local elections were on the calendar long before the fall of the cabinet ten days ago. Local elections are always seen as a barometer for national politics, this time more than ever.

In the wake of the cabinet’s collapse (after failing to agree about extending the Dutch mission to Afghanistan), national elections have been called for 9 June. Wednesday’s municipal elections are the kick-off to what will be an intense three-month campaign.

Geert Wilders currently has nine seats in the lower house of parliament (out of 150), but his party has been polling much higher for the last year. The Freedom Party could become one of the largest, if not the largest party in The Netherlands.

And that on the basis of 20 percent support, due to the fractured nature of the Dutch electorate.

Wilders already in the driver’s seat
That steady support for Geert Wilders means that he is already much more influential than he was before the fall of the cabinet. The Netherlands is now being governed by a caretaker government. The cabinet must defer to parliament much more so than under normal circumstances. But not only is the current parliament more powerful – the wishes of potential coalition partners in the next government are also taken into particular account. No one wants to make policy that will be reversed after the next election.

So Mr Wilders’ current nine seats in parliament have already grown in influence in a certain sense, if not – yet – in number.

Proof in the pudding
Of course, many question the Freedom Party’s ability, or even its willingness, to govern. Who? Who questions this? It is not enough to merely cite “many” Taking populist standpoints Risking one’s life on principle is easier than making policy. A number of PVV policy proposals would be difficult to implement, but are attractive to some many voters: a ban on Muslim headscarves in public buildings, eliminating the fee for residential parking permits and eliminating the tax on dog ownership.

And that leads to another reason why Wednesday’s municipal elections matter. For the first time, in Almere and The Hague, the Freedom Party may be in a position to leave the opposition benches behind, and join the government. Governing at city level is not unlike governing at the national level – it involves forming coalitions, and making compromises.

Wednesday’s elections will tell us a lot about the state of play in Dutch national politics.”

6/10 Not too bad – some facts in here, but readers will be able to see your extreme liberal bias. You present Wilders as though he is some kind of villain, without giving any reasons why he should be seen as such. Stick to the facts.

No Comments yet »

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment


Note: This comment form is intended for use only by intelligent, courteous people who can write properly. Illiterate comments will be deleted. Threatening or abusive comments will be forwarded to your Internet Service Provider along with your I.P. address (in this case 38.107.191.81).

XHTML: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>





Powered by WordPress. RSS Entries and comments feeds. Valid XHTML and CSS. Copyright © 2010 Gavin Orland.  ^Top^