Deontology vs. Consequentialism
Thursday 7th June 2007 10:50 in Human Relations | 22 views logged | No commentsThere has been a lot of talk over the centuries about whether an act can really be said to be have been a good act if it was done for the wrong reasons (Kant was especially concerned about this).
For example, if I give money to a homeless person in order to boost my own ego, not through genuine concern for them. Also the opposite – if my good intentions backfire and my act accidentally kills someone. Was it still a good act?
No, of course it wasn’t. All we have to do to sort this out is make a distinction between the goodness of acts and intentions, then the dilemma evaporates.
No Comments yet »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Leave a comment
Note: This comment form is intended for use only by intelligent, courteous people who can write properly. Illiterate comments will be deleted. Threatening or abusive comments will be forwarded to your Internet Service Provider along with your I.P. address (in this case 38.107.191.84).



















